The Project Gutenberg EBook of Extraction of the Teeth, by J. F. Colyer

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license


Title: Extraction of the Teeth

Author: J. F. Colyer

Release Date: August 4, 2016 [EBook #52720]

Language: English

Character set encoding: UTF-8

*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EXTRACTION OF THE TEETH ***




Produced by deaurider, Chuck Greif and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)

EXTRACTION OF THE TEETH.

{i} 

{ii} 

{iii} 

EXTRACTION   OF   THE   TEETH

BY
J. F. COLYER, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S. L.D.S.
Dental Surgeon and Lecturer on Dental Surgery to Charing Cross Hospital:
Assistant Dental Surgeon to the Dental Hospital of London


London:
CLAUDIUS ASH & SONS, Limited,
5, 6, 7, 8 AND 9, BROAD STREET, GOLDEN SQUARE, W.
—
1896

{iv} 

{v} 

CONTENTS.

{vi} 

{1} 

EXTRACTION OF THE TEETH.

CHAPTER I.
———
The General Principles of Extraction of the Teeth.

As an operation, extraction of teeth is fortunately becoming more rare, but even now large numbers are needlessly sacrificed, in many cases owing to ignorance on the part of the patient of the value of the teeth, at times to lack of knowledge on the part of both operator and patient of the modern methods of conservative dentistry. With the assistance of antiseptics in the treatment of root-canals, and the increase in knowledge of the methods of filling and crowning teeth, it is now possible to retain many which would in former days have been extracted—indeed it may be said with truth that all teeth and many roots are capable of being saved and rendered useful, with the exception of—

(1) Those teeth whose roots are much shortened by absorption.{2}

(2) Those teeth from which the alveolar process has disappeared to such an extent as to leave them quite loose; and

(3) Those teeth attacked with chronic periodontitis, which, in spite of treatment, tends to become worse.

Special circumstances naturally alter cases; for instance, with patients the subjects of nervous prostration, or feeble in health, a lengthy operation is often contra-indicated, and under such conditions extraction may be preferable to the lengthy and tedious processes of conservative treatment. Another indication for extraction is in cases of teeth setting up or aggravating ulceration of the tongue, lips, or other soft parts of the mouth. Teeth fractured in a longitudinal direction should generally be removed, and the same rule applies to those which are so misplaced as to be incapable of being brought into the normal arch. In crowded conditions of the teeth extraction is often called for, and under such circumstances is really conservative treatment.

If extraction be determined upon, a careful examination of the tooth to be removed should be made. This will allow some idea to be formed of the amount of sound tissue present, and also of the force which will be necessary for the dislodgment of the tooth. In the case of roots, the edges must be defined, and for this purpose a blunt probe,{3} similar in pattern to that shown in fig. 1 will be found useful.

Fig. 1.

Instruments.—The instruments in general use for the removal of teeth are forceps and elevators. The Forceps is an amplified pair of pincers or pliers. It is made up of three parts, namely, the blades or portions beyond the joint which are applied to the tooth, the joint itself, and the handles. Forceps should be made of fine steel, should be light and yet strong enough to withstand without bending any strain that may be put upon them.[1] The blades should be shaped to fit the tooth they are intended to remove, and they should be clear of the crown when applied. On longitudinal section a blade should present a thin wedge-shaped appearance. Two kinds of joints are met with. In the first variety one half of the forceps passes through a slot in the other, the two being held together by a rivet passing through the centre (fig. 2). In the second variety (fig. 3) the two halves are held together side by side by a{4} screw or pin which takes the entire strain. Most forceps of English manufacture are made on the latter plan, which has the advantage of permitting the instrument to be easily cleaned; it also allows a slight lateral movement of the two halves—a point of some practical importance. It is urged against this style of joint that it is weak; in practice, however, this is not found to be the case.

Fig. 2.   Fig. 3.

The handles should be of a size and shape to lie comfortably in the palm of the hand, and should be in such relation to the blades that when the latter are applied in the direction of the long axis of the tooth, the handles clear the lips.

As a general rule, in forceps designed for the removal of the anterior teeth in the maxilla, the blades and handles are in the same line (fig. 4),{5}

Fig. 4.   Fig. 5.

while for the upper back teeth the handles form a curve of greater or less extent with the blades (fig. 5). In forceps for the lower teeth the blades are bent down from the handles to an angle of nearly ninety degrees. In one class, namely, the hawk’s-bill, when the blades are applied to the tooth the handles are at right angles to the line of{6} the arch (fig. 6), while in other classes the handles are in line with the arch (fig. 7).

Fig. 6.   Fig. 7.

The manner of holding forceps is shown in figs. 8, 9, 10. The handles should rest comfortably in the palmar surface of the hand, and in such a manner that the end of one handle rests between the thenar and hypothenar eminences—a portion{7} of the hand where force can be applied with advantage.

The thumb placed between the handles acts as a regulator to control the amount of pressure of the blades upon the tooth. As a precaution it is well to have the ball of the thumb well between the handles, so that the pressure is counteracted not only by the soft tissues, but also by the terminal bony phalanx of the thumb. If this precaution be not observed, any sudden crushing of the tooth may be accompanied by a severe and very painful contusion of the operator’s thumb.

Fig. 8.

Mode of holding forceps for the removal of upper teeth.

The Elevator consists of two parts—the handle and the blade. The former, usually made of wood or ivory, is about four inches in length and of a shape suitable to allow a firm grip being obtained of it by the hand. The blade is made of fine steel, and is about two inches long. Elevators are of two varieties, straight and curved. In the first form the blade is thin,{8} about one-fifth of an inch in breadth, one surface being made convex and the other flat. The point of the blade may be rounded as shown in fig. 11, or spear-shaped, as shown in fig. 12.

Fig. 9.

Mode of holding lower “hawk’s bill” pattern forceps.

Fig. 10.

Mode of holding forceps of pattern shown in fig. 30.

In the curved variety, the terminal half inch of the steel portion of the instrument is bent at an{9} angle with the shaft of the instrument (fig. 49). The edge of the blade of an elevator should always be kept sharp.

The method of holding an elevator is shown in fig. 13. The handle should rest comfortably in the palm of the hand, the first finger lying along the blade and being brought near the point so as to prevent the instrument slipping. When using the elevator for the removal of teeth on the right side of the mandible, the finger should lie along the curved side of the blade, and on the flat side when extracting teeth on the left side.

The Screw (fig. 14) is an instrument which on rare occasions is useful for the removal of deep seated roots.

After being used, instruments of every kind should be freed from all foreign matter and then carefully sterilised.{10}

The next point which demands attention is the position of the operator and patient. The chair should be placed before a good light, and if a proper dental chair is not to hand an ordinary arm chair may be utilised; failing this, two ordinary chairs may be placed back to back, on one of which the left leg of the operator should be raised to form a rest for the patient’s head. The patient should be placed in such an unconstrained position as will allow the operator to exert all necessary movements with freedom.

Fig. 13.

Fig. 14.

{11}

The operator should place himself so as to use his force to the greatest advantage. His left arm may be utilised, if necessary, for steadying the movements of the patient’s head, while the fingers of the left hand can be employed—

(1) To keep the cheek and other soft parts away so as to obtain a clear view of the tooth to be extracted and its immediate neighbours;

(2) To support the mandible;

(3) To grasp the alveolus and so allow some idea to be gained of the effect of the force employed.

The special positions for the removal of different teeth will be described in chapter ii.

It may be advantageous, before describing the steps of the operation of extraction, to refer briefly to a few points in the anatomy of the teeth and jaws which have a direct bearing upon the manner of carrying it out.

If the teeth be examined it will be noticed that they are capable of division into—

(1) Teeth with single, rounded tapering roots;

(2) Teeth with single roots more or less irregularly flattened or curved;

(3) Teeth with multiple roots.

Under (1) are included the upper incisors (temporary and permanent) and the lower bicuspids; (2) the lower incisors and canines (temporary and permanent), and also the upper canines and{12} bicuspids; (3) the upper and lower molars (temporary and permanent) and frequently the first upper bicuspids.[2]

The shape of the roots, as we shall subsequently find, has an important bearing upon the manner in which force is to be applied when severing them from their attachments.

A correct acquaintance with the disposition of the alveoli of the teeth is of importance for skilful and successful operating. Fig. 15 gives a general idea of the appearance of the alveoli, but it is needless to say that a full knowledge can only be really obtained by a careful study of the bones themselves; by this means, too, some idea of the strength of different portions of the alveolar borders can be obtained—a matter of some moment when applying force in the process of removing a tooth from its socket. The points to be specially noted in the maxilla are the thinness of the outer alveolar wall as compared with the inner, the prominence of the canine socket, and the cancellous character of the bone in the region of the third molar. In the mandible the outer alveolar border will be seen to be thinner than the inner, with the exception of that portion in the region of the{13}

Fig. 15.

From the “American System of Dentistry.”

third, and often of the second molar; another fact worthy of attention is that at the posterior portion{14} of the socket of the third molar the bone is moderately dense.

When performed with forceps the operation of tooth extraction may be divided into three stages:—

(1) Adaptation of the forceps to the tooth.

(2) Destruction of its membranous connections with, and dilatation of, the socket.

(3) Removal of the tooth from the socket.

In the initial stage the first step is the application of the blades, and, in this connection, care must be taken to see that the points pass between the gum and the tooth, and also that they are applied parallel with the long axis of the root. It is, as a rule, best first to apply the blade on the side of the tooth most obscured from view, and then lightly to close the other upon the opposite side. The blades should then be forcibly pressed upwards or downwards, as the case may be, in the direction of the apex of the root; a slight rotary or wriggling motion will often be found of assistance in the process. This “pressing” movement should be continued until a firm hold of the root has been obtained—a point of great importance, as upon it the successful removal of the tooth in a large measure depends. The handles should next be firmly closed, so as to give the blades a good grip, and the amount of pressure applied should be such, that when movement has commenced{15} the blades do not ride upon the surface of the root. The amount of pressure to be applied must naturally vary according to the character of the tooth to be removed, and the resistance offered by the alveolar process. The thumb placed between the handles of the forceps, as previously pointed out, should counteract the pressure applied to the root and prevent crushing, which, should it occur, may make the subsequent removal very difficult.

The second stage—the destruction of the membranous attachments and dilatation of the socket—is accomplished by employing force in either a rotary or a lateral direction. The movement to be employed depends upon the form of the root or roots to be removed and the resisting strength of the surrounding hard structures, and at this point it need only be remarked that rotary motion is alone admissible in the case of teeth possessing a single conical root.

The final stage is carried out by exerting extractive force in the direction of the long axis of the tooth, and also in that of least resistance; the latter is determined by a knowledge of the anatomy of the alveolar border, and by the sensation conveyed to the hand through the forceps.

The removal of a tooth with a straight elevator is accomplished in the following manner. The blade, with the flattened surface towards the tooth to be removed, is inserted between the root{16} and the alveolus, the instrument being kept as far as possible parallel with the anterior surface of the crown. The blade is then forced downwards so as to reach the root at as low a point as possible; the handle of the elevator is then rotated away from the direction in which the tooth is to be removed. This has the effect of both raising the tooth in its socket and displacing it in the required direction. One such movement of the instrument rarely suffices for the removal of a tooth, a second, and sometimes a third grip, each time nearer to the apex of the root, having to be obtained.

The method of using a curved elevator will be described in dealing with the removal of the roots of lower molar teeth.

The wound resulting from the removal of a tooth is a lacerated one, and heals by “granulation.” The socket immediately after the operation becomes filled with coagulated blood, which is eventually replaced by granulation tissue, followed at a later period by the formation of loose cancellous bone.

A varying amount of absorption of the alveolar border always follows the removal of a tooth, the continuity in the surface of the gum being restored by ordinary cicatricial fibrous tissue.

The wound is best treated by keeping the parts carefully cleansed as far as possible from all foreign matter, and for this purpose an antiseptic{17} mouth-wash[3] should be used several times a day. From the wound resulting from the extraction of an upper tooth the discharge drains away in a natural manner owing to the orifice being the most dependent part. From the wound caused by the removal of a lower tooth such is not the case, and should suppuration take place the socket must be frequently syringed with some antiseptic solution, and if necessary, packed.

The Extraction of the Temporary Teeth.—Although the actual details of the extraction of the temporary teeth do not differ from those of the permanent teeth, there are, nevertheless, one or two points to which attention may with advantage be directed. First and foremost, a child should not be deceived, and if it is necessary to extract a tooth, the child should be told and not taken unawares. When, too, a child resists having a tooth removed, the operation must not be forcibly carried out, for by a little patience and moral suasion on the part of the operator, the better side of a child’s nature can generally be{18} gained. It should also be remembered that anæsthetics are quite as needful for the extraction of the temporary as the permanent teeth, the pain to be borne by a child being quite as great as that to be endured by an adult.{19}

CHAPTER II.
———
The Extraction of Individual Teeth.

(1)UPPER TEETH.—For the removal of teeth in the maxilla the patient should be placed at such a level that the arm of the operator can, if necessary, embrace the head of the patient with comfort. The operator should stand at the right side of the patient, and slightly in front, the first finger and thumb being placed on either side of the alveolus (fig. 16). In the event of the patient becoming restless, the arm should be shifted so as to encircle the head and hold it firmly.

(a) Upper Incisors.—The roots of both the upper central and lateral incisors are usually cone shaped, the anterior surface being the arc of a greater circle than that of the posterior. Forceps for the removal of these teeth ought therefore to have the blades made in a corresponding manner (see fig. 17). The lateral incisor is smaller than the central, and has at times a root somewhat flattened. In removing upper incisors the posterior blade is applied first, care being taken to{20}

Fig. 16.

see that the edge of the instrument passes between the gum and the tooth. To dislodge these teeth a firm inward movement should be made in a direction towards the palate, this movement being followed by one in an outward direction. If this fails to dislodge the tooth from its attachments, a firm rotary motion, first to the right and then to the left, may be tried (the amount of rotation necessary being only about an eighth of the circle represented by the circumference of the root).{21} Rotation is generally recommended in the first instance for the extraction of these teeth, but the inward movement is, I think, best, the teeth yielding more readily and with less laceration of the soft tissues.

The extraction of the roots of these teeth does not as a rule present much difficulty. When moderately sound the instrument shown in fig. 17 may be used, but in those instances where the root is much decayed, and lies well below the gum margin, a rather finer pair will be found more serviceable. The manner of removal is similar to that used when the crown is standing.

Fig. 17.

(b) Upper Canines.—These teeth, like the incisors, are single rooted, but the difference between the curve of the anterior and posterior surfaces is greater. The roots too are much longer, more firmly implanted, and hence require more force in their removal. Forceps similar in pattern to those used for incisors may be used, the severance of the{22} tooth from its attachments being brought about by force applied in an inward, followed by an outward, direction. The root being more or less three sided, rotation cannot well be adopted.

The roots of canine teeth are to be removed in the same manner as that adopted for the whole tooth.

(c) Upper Bicuspids.—The first bicuspid has usually one root flattened and more or less longitudinally grooved on its mesial and distal surfaces. If this grooving is much marked, it results in a greater or less division of the root into two slender terminations. Whether such bifurcation exists or not can seldom be determined before operation and would not modify the method adopted, but the tendency to this variation should be borne in mind and the lateral movement be very gently applied. The internal and external surfaces of the root are for all practical purposes of equal curvature.

The second bicuspid has usually only one root, which is not so flattened in the antero-posterior diameter as the first. There is also not the same tendency to grooving or bifurcation of the root as there is in the first bicuspid.

The blades of forceps for the bicuspids should be equal segments of the same circle; they should also be bent at an angle with the handles, so that the latter may clear the lower lip. The forceps shown in fig. 18 is a useful pattern. In removing{23} an upper bicuspid, the inner blade of the forceps should be applied first. For severing the tooth from its attachments a slight inward movement should first be made, followed by an outward one. If this fails to cause the socket to yield, the inward movement may again be made, followed by an outward one, and repeated if necessary. The removal of the tooth from its socket is to be carried out by force applied in a downward and outward direction. It is well to remember that the force applied to the inward should always be slight compared to that used in the outward direction. The removal of bicuspid roots is carried out in a manner similar to that for the whole tooth.

Fig. 18.

(d) Upper Molars.—The first upper molar has three roots, one internal towards the palate (palatine), and two external (buccal); of the three the palatine is the largest, sub-cylindrical in form, and often curved. The two buccal roots are placed in an anterior and posterior{24} position, the latter being in a plane internal to the anterior one; both these roots are somewhat flattened, and of the two the anterior is the larger. The roots of the second molar are similar in shape to the first, but are usually smaller. The third molar, when normal, has three roots, but very frequently these are all fused together so as to form an abrupt tapering cone, the point of which is often curved.

Fig. 19.

Owing to the disposition of the roots different forceps will be required for the removal of upper molars on the right and left side. Of the blades, the outer or buccal should possess two grooves, the anterior being the broader and placed in a more external plane. This blade should also have a slight projection between the grooved surfaces to adapt itself to the space between the buccal roots. The inner or palatal blade should possess only one groove. A well-made pair of upper molar forceps should fit the neck of a first upper permanent molar accurately. The blades should be bent at an angle with the handles, so that when in{25} use the latter may clear the lower lip (fig. 19). The palatine blade should be applied first, and in bringing the outer blade into place the point should be kept over the groove on the buccal side of the tooth, as this groove is a guide to the space between the outer roots. To sever these teeth from their attachments force must be applied first slightly inwards and then outwards, the movements being repeated if necessary, the removal of the tooth from the socket being carried out by exerting force in a downward and outward direction. Too much outward movement leads to undue bending or fracture of the external alveolar plate.

Fig. 20.

In removing the third molars it is advisable not to have the patient’s mouth opened to the fullest extent, as the tension of the tissues of the cheek will thereby be lessened and a clearer view of the outer side of the tooth thus gained. The application of the forceps is of the utmost importance, as one is liable, unless care is taken, to include some of the soft tissue between the blades{26} and the tooth and so cause a painful laceration. Force applied inwards and then outwards is generally sufficient to loosen these teeth, their removal being carried out by a downward and outward movement.

Forceps similar to those shown in fig. 19 may be used for the removal of the third molars, but most operators use patterns the blades of which are similar segments of the same circle (fig. 20).

a  b  c  d
Fig. 21.

(a) Normal upper first permanent molar. (b) Oblique rooted upper first permanent molar. (c) Normal upper second permanent molar. (d) Oblique rooted second permanent molar.

There is an abnormality of the upper molars which may with advantage be mentioned here. In this deformity the posterior buccal root is situated in a plane much internal to the anterior—in other words, it is an exaggeration of the normal arrangement. Such teeth have been termed by Mr. Booth Pearsall “oblique rooted” (fig. 21). The abnormality is met with most frequently in the third molar, sometimes in the second, rarely in the first. The difficulty encountered in extracting these teeth is{27} that the outer blade of the forceps tends to slip round. Oblique-rooted teeth can at times be diagnosed by noting an undue prominence of the alveolus over the anterior buccal root, and are best removed with forceps similar to that shown in fig. 20.

In cases where a portion of the crown remains and the decay extends well below the gum on either the palatal or buccal side, ordinary molar forceps should be discarded and root forceps employed; useful patterns are shown in figs. 18, 22 and 23. The removal of teeth in this condition is carried out as follows, and for the sake of description it will be supposed that the decay extends deeply on the palatine side. One blade of the forceps should be first applied to the buccal side of the tooth and to the root which is considered the stronger; the inner blade should then be applied to the palatine root care being taken to insinuate it between the alveolus and the root. The forceps should then be pushed well upwards until a firm hold of the root is obtained. A firm inward movement should then be made, as this will allow the inner blade to pass still higher up the palatine fang and insure steadiness should the blades tend to ride upon the surface of the root. An outward movement should next be made, but to nothing like so great a degree as that used in extracting molars with the whole of{28} the crown standing. This inward and outward movement is to be repeated until the tooth is freed, the force being principally applied in the inward direction.

Fig. 22.

Fig. 23.

For the removal of roots towards the back of the mouth.

When the more extensive decay has taken place{29} on the buccal side the order of proceeding is slightly different. The first blade to be applied should be the palatine, the outer blade being closed upon whichever of the buccal roots is considered the stronger.

The extractive force should be applied first outwards and then inwards, these movements being repeated if necessary, the principal force being outwards, as the object in view is to prevent the instrument slipping off the more decayed side.

When a molar is so decayed that but little of the crown remains, but all the roots are still united, root forceps are indicated. In such a case the inner blade is to be applied to the palatine root first, the outer blade being closed upon the stronger of the buccal fangs. Inward followed by outward movement should be employed, the point to bear in mind being to use force towards the side of the tooth which is considered the weaker. In the majority of such cases the three roots come away together, but even if this does not happen, one or perhaps two will be removed, the remainder being subsequently removed with but little difficulty.

In cases where the resistance presented by the roots is very great and an unsuccessful attempt has been made with ordinary root forceps, an instrument with a buccal blade similar to that shown in fig. 24 may be used. The inner blade is first applied, the outer one being brought so as to come,{30} if possible, into the space between the buccal roots. A firm hold of the roots having been gained, an attempt to extract should be made by force applied in an inward and outward direction; this failing, sufficient pressure should be put upon the handles to split the roots asunder. The sharp outer blade of the forceps will then pass between the divided buccal roots on to the palatine root, which can thus readily be brought away. A pair of ordinary upper root forceps should be employed for removing the buccal roots.

If all the three roots of a molar are separate, their extraction presents but little difficulty, a slight rotary movement generally sufficing.

In all cases where there is a fear of a molar fracturing, root in preference to ordinary forceps should be used.

Fig. 24.

(2) LOWER TEETH.—For the removal of lower teeth the patient should be placed on a low level, the head being kept a little forward and the chin depressed. The position of the operator will naturally differ with the tooth to be removed{31}

Fig. 25.

and also with the instrument to be used. With teeth on the right side, when hawk’s-bill pattern forceps or elevators are used, the operator should stand behind and to the right of the patient, the left arm being brought round the patient’s head. The thumb of the left hand should be placed on the inner side and the first finger on the outer side of the alveolus of the tooth to be removed, and the three remaining fingers under and supporting the chin. In placing the fingers in the mouth,{32} care should be taken to keep the wrist well down so as not to impede the entrance of light (fig. 25).

Fig. 26.

When removing the anterior teeth or those on the left side of the mouth, the operator should stand on the right side and slightly in front of the patient. The left hand should be placed as{33} follows: the second finger on the lingual side, and the first on the labial side of the alveolus of the tooth to be extracted, the thumb being placed under the chin (fig. 26).

When employing forceps of the straight pattern shown in fig. 30, the operator should stand as shown in fig. 26, but it will be found difficult to place the fingers of the left hand on either side of the alveolus, indeed they can only well be used for retracting the cheek and supporting the jaw.

In removing teeth from the lower jaw, the operator should be careful, in raising the tooth from the socket, to guard against a sudden separation of the tooth from its attachments which might result in damage to the upper teeth.

Fig. 27.

(a) Lower Incisors.—These teeth each have a single root which is much flattened laterally. For their removal, forceps similar to those shown in fig. 27 should be used, the blades being equal{34} segments of the same circle. The lingual blade should be applied first, the loosening movement being made by taking the tooth slightly inwards and then outwards, the final extractive force being upwards and outwards.

The removal of lower incisor roots is carried out in a similar manner.

(b) Lower Canines.—The lower canines have normally one root, which is flattened laterally. In comparison with the incisors, the root is stronger and longer. The removal of a lower canine is carried out in a manner similar to that employed for a lower incisor, but as the tooth presents more resistance, a greater amount of force is usually required.

(c) Lower Bicuspids.—The lower bicuspids have normally one root which is conical in shape. In the first bicuspid the conical shape of the root is not so marked as in the second, the outer aspect being the arc of rather a larger circle than the posterior. Forceps similar to those shown in fig. 27 may be used, the blades for all practical purposes being equal in size and shape. The lingual blade of the instrument should be applied first, the severing of the tooth from its attachments being carried out by a slight rotary movement around the long axis of the tooth first in one direction and then in the other; should this not succeed, a slight inward followed by an{35} outward movement may be tried, the tooth being raised from its socket by force applied in an upward and slightly outward direction.

The roots of lower bicuspids are to be removed in a manner similar to that required for the extraction of a whole tooth. When the root lies much below the level of the gum the extraction is often troublesome owing to the difficulty in gaining a hold with the blades of the forceps; in such cases, if an attempt with forceps has failed, the straight elevator may be employed.

Fig. 28.

(d) Lower Molars.—Lower molars have two roots, placed anteriorly and posteriorly. The roots are much flattened and have a tendency to curve backwards, this being well marked in the second and especially so in the third molar; a fusion of the two roots is at times met with in the second and frequently in the third molar. A section of a lower molar at the neck shows both the buccal and lingual aspects to be composed of two segments of a circle touching each other at one extremity; the anterior segment being slightly the larger (fig. 28). Each blade of the forceps used for these teeth should possess two grooves,{36}

Fig. 29.   Fig. 30.

separated by a projection which fits into the division between the anterior and posterior roots; for all practical purposes the blades may be made of the same size, so that one instrument will suffice for both sides of the jaw. The instrument best adapted for the removal of these teeth is shown in fig. 29, though some operators prefer the shape illustrated in fig. 30. The advantages of the{37} former over the latter may be briefly summed up as follows:

(1) A clear view of the tooth and its surroundings can be obtained during the whole period of removal.

(2) Force can be applied with greater advantage.

(3) The alveolus can be easily embraced by the fingers, or by the finger and thumb of the left hand.

(4) In removing the tooth from the socket a slight backward movement can be employed.

One disadvantage of shape fig. 29 is that it is difficult to employ much inward movement, and therefore, for teeth lying inwards, namely, with the crown directed towards the tongue, hawk’s-bill-shaped forceps cannot easily be used.

Another disadvantage is that the extent of inward movement is limited by the proximity of the upper teeth, and in case of trismus it is often better to use straight forceps (fig. 30). In cases where there are also much swelling and rigidity of the cheek the straight forceps cause less inconvenience to the patient.

In removing lower molars with forceps, the inner blade should be first applied and then the outer, care being taken to get the points of the blades between the interspace of the roots. For severing these teeth from their attachments, a slight inward movement should be first made, followed by one well outwards, this inward and{38} outward movement being repeated if necessary. The removal of the tooth from its socket is carried out by force used in an upward and outward direction. The upward force exerted upon lower teeth should always be well under control, as not infrequently the resistance is very suddenly overcome, and, if such precaution is not taken, there is danger of striking the upper teeth with considerable force.

Fig. 31.

{39}

As previously pointed out, the roots of these teeth are at times curved a little backwards so that it is often needful in removing the teeth from their sockets to twist the forceps in a curved direction backwards.

In the removal of the second molar too much outward movement is not permissible, as the outer alveolus is often very dense.

The third molar is best removed with a straight elevator. A glance at the illustration of this tooth (fig. 31) will show that the roots have a well-marked curve backwards, in addition to which the bone forming the socket of this tooth is stronger than is the case with the anterior molars. The removal of the third molar has therefore to be accomplished by using force in a direction upwards and backwards, in other words, in a curve similar to the arc of the circle formed by the roots. This movement cannot well be carried out with forceps, but is easily accomplished with the elevator as follows (it being assumed that the second molar is in place):—Hold the elevator as shown in fig. 13, and insert the blade between the anterior surface of the root and the alveolus, keeping the flattened side of the instrument as far as possible parallel with the root surface. Then force the blade downwards in a direction towards the apex of the root; following this, rotate the handle away from the direction in which the tooth is to{40} be moved. This has the effect of both raising the tooth in its socket and displacing it backward. The edge of the elevator which is to be brought into contact with the surface of the root should be sharp so as to cut somewhat into the cementum. Should this prove insufficient the handle should again be raised and the flattened surface of the instrument brought parallel with the anterior surface of the root and the extractive movement repeated until the tooth is completely raised from its socket.

In using the elevator, especial care must be taken to protect the tongue with the fingers or thumb of the left hand, so as to prevent a slip, which might result in puncture of the tongue, or of the operator’s finger.

With the third lower molar there is a tendency for the gum to adhere tenaciously to the posterior part of the neck of the tooth. When this happens it is better to simply raise the tooth from its socket with the elevator or forceps, as the case may be, and then cut the gum away with a curved pair of scissors. By this method a severe laceration of the gum may at times be avoided.

When the third molar is isolated owing to the absence of the second molar, the elevator may still be employed for its removal, on the right side the first finger, and on the left side the thumb of the left hand being used as the fulcrum. In such{41} cases, however, many operators prefer to use ordinary lower molar forceps.

The removal of lower molars when a portion of the crown is standing, but the decay has progressed below the gum on either the buccal or the lingual aspect, is carried out with root forceps of shape shown in fig. 27. A condition similar to this in upper molars and the method indicated for their removal were referred to on page 27. The principles enumerated there apply equally to the removal of lower molars, so that it will not be necessary to repeat them. The main points to bear in mind are, to apply the blades of the forceps to the stronger root, and to use the principal force in the direction of the weaker wall.

Where the roots of molars are still united, root forceps should be used, the blade being first applied to the lingual surface of the stronger root. A firm hold having been obtained, the root may be removed by employing force in a manner similar to that employed with ordinary molar forceps. In this way both roots will usually come away together. If, however, only one root is extracted, the remaining one can easily be removed, either with the same forceps or a curved elevator. The curved elevator (fig. 49) may be employed either by placing it against the root, and so forcing it into the socket of the root already removed, or by placing the blade in the{42} socket of the extracted root, forcing the point of the instrument through the intervening bone and then elevating the remaining root.

With roots of lower molars which present great resistance, forceps with cutting blades may be used (fig. 32). The blades are inserted on the lingual and buccal aspects of the arch in such a manner that the points pass into the space between the roots. The handles are then closed and an attempt is made to remove the roots in the ordinary way, but should this prove unsuccessful the handles must be forcibly closed, so as to divide the roots which can then, as a rule, be removed with ordinary root forceps.

The value of splitting roots in a case similar to that shown in fig. 33 is apparent, for, as will be seen, it allows each root to be removed in the line of its inclination.

Fig. 32.

In those cases where the roots are separated their removal is carried out with root forceps, an inward and outward movement being usually sufficient.

The roots of third molars are best removed with{43} a straight elevator. The modus operandi is similar to that used in extracting the whole tooth.

a  b

Fig. 33.

(a) Lower molar with divergent roots. (b) The dotted lines show the direction in which the root can be removed if the tooth is divided as suggested in the text.

At times the lower molar teeth are much tilted in such a way that the crown surface stands towards the tongue.—Under such conditions their removal is best carried out with instruments of the pattern shown in fig. 30, since the handles of forceps of the hawk’s-bill pattern when applied would come in contact with the upper teeth, and thus impede the inward movement which is so necessary for the removal of teeth in this position.

The Temporary Teeth.—For the removal of upper incisors and canines, a small pair of straight forceps of the pattern shown in fig. 34 should be used. The first upper temporary molars are best removed with a pair of forceps like fig. 35.

The lower incisors and canines require a small pair of hawk’s-bill forceps similar to the shape shown in fig. 27. For the lower temporary molars,{44} a small pair of forceps similar to that illustrated in fig. 29 should be used.

Fig. 34.   Fig. 35.

In removing the temporary teeth, care must be taken not to drive the forceps up too high, for fear of injuring the permanent teeth; this is more especially to be noted in connection with the temporary molars, as the roots of these teeth practically embrace the crowns of the bicuspids.{45} Generally speaking, if a temporary molar fractures in the attempt to remove it, the portion of tooth remaining in the jaw should be left alone unless it can be brought away quite easily.

Fig. 36.

Roots in the condition shown in fig. 36 are best removed with an elevator as follows: the thumb of the right hand being placed on an adjacent tooth so as to gain a hold, the point of the elevator should be placed below the end of the root and force applied. In a few cases it may be necessary to cut the gum with a lancet before using the elevator.

Small pieces of the temporary teeth which persist and become wedged in between the permanent teeth can be best removed with an excavator or a similar suitable instrument.{46}

CHAPTER III.
———
The Extraction of Misplaced Teeth.

Nothing, perhaps, tests the skill of a good operator more than the extraction of a misplaced or impacted tooth, and although it is impossible to give anything like a complete list of the various malpositions met with, those most commonly seen will be mentioned, and the usual method for removing such teeth indicated.

Fig. 37.

{47}

(a) Upper Central Incisors.—An irregularity of this tooth calling for removal is shown in fig. 37.

The extraction is best carried out with an instrument similar to that shown in fig. 38, the fine inner blade being applied on the palatal side and the broad blade on the labial. Extractive force should be applied principally in the outward direction, and if this is not sufficient, slight rotary movement should be tried. In cases where there is less room between the approximal teeth, the projecting tooth may be removed with a pair of straight forceps (fig. 17), the blades being applied to the mesial and distal aspects of the root. The blades should not be driven very far up, and the loosening of the tooth should be accomplished by slight rotary motion, in using which care should be taken to avoid loosening the approximal teeth.

Fig. 38.

(b) Upper Lateral Incisors lying internal to the{48} arch, as shown in fig. 39, can be removed with the forceps shown in fig. 38, by placing the fine blade on the labial and the broad blade on the palatal side of the tooth. Extractive movement should be made inwards, followed by very slight outward movement; this failing, rotation should be tried, but as pointed out on a previous page, this form of movement is not so suitable for lateral incisors as for centrals.

Fig. 39.

(c) Upper Canines placed high in the arch, as shown in fig. 40, may be extracted with a straight pair of forceps (fig. 17), the blades being placed on the mesial and labial aspects of the root. Extraction of such teeth is very difficult. Slight but firm rotation may first be tried; if this fails to loosen the tooth, slight lateral movement may be{49} attempted, the force being applied towards and then away from the median line of the mouth.

Fig. 40.

Fig. 41.

(d) Upper Bicuspids misplaced, as shown in fig. 41, can be removed with forceps, as shown in figs.{50} 18 and 22, the blades being applied on the anterior and posterior aspects of the tooth. Force should be applied in a backward and forward direction, the movements being repeated and persevered with until the tooth is loosened in its socket.

Fig. 42.

Fig. 43.

{51}

A bicuspid placed as shown in fig. 42 can be removed with forceps similar in form to those depicted in figs. 18 and 22, with the outer blade strong but narrow. The extractive movement should be made mainly in an inward direction.

Fig. 44.

(e) Lower Central Incisors placed similarly to that shown in fig. 43 may be removed with ordinary lower root forceps (hawk’s-bill pattern), the blades being placed on the mesial and distal surfaces of the root, and movement applied in a direction to and away from the median line of the mouth. When the crowding is not so extreme as shown in fig. 44, forceps of the hawk’s-bill pattern with a strong but narrow inner blade should be used (fig. 45), and the principal extractive movement made in an outward direction. For an incisor placed as shown in fig. 47, the narrow blade should be the outer one (fig. 46), and the principal force should be applied in an inward direction.

(f) Lower Bicuspids placed as in fig. 48 are{52}

Fig. 45.   Fig. 46.

most difficult teeth to remove. One of the most useful instruments for their extraction is a pair of upper root forceps (Read’s pattern, fig. 22), which should be held so that the curve of the blades is downwards. The blades should grasp the root on its anterior and posterior surfaces. Slight rotary{53} movement may first be attempted, followed by lateral motion. These movements may be persevered with until the tooth is found to yield. Too much haste may lead to a fracture, which would be extremely difficult to deal with.

Fig. 47.

Fig. 48.

In cases where the crowding is not so great, and the tooth is more in the normal line of the arch, a forceps with a narrow outer blade will suffice (fig. 46). Extractive force should be used principally{54} towards the median line of the mouth, and this may be combined with slight rotary movement.

Fig. 49.

(g) Impacted Lower Third Molars are amongst the most difficult teeth to extract. Where the{55} tooth is deep-seated, the gum should be pushed aside by careful packing, and as clear a view of the tooth as is possible obtained. For removing these teeth it is difficult to give any rules, as each case must be treated on its own merits.

As useful an instrument as any for their removal is a curved elevator (fig. 49), the blade of which can often be inserted under the crown, and assuming that good leverage is thus obtained, the tooth can be prised up. Sometimes the tooth is firmly embedded in the bone. In such cases a clear view of the tooth may be obtained by gradually packing the soft tissues apart, the periosteum covering the alveolus should then be raised, and the bone surrounding the tooth cut away with suitable instruments. The tooth, when freely exposed, should be removed with an elevator or forceps.

The wound resulting must be carefully packed and treated as described on page 85.{56}

CHAPTER IV.
———
The Use of Anæsthetics during Extraction of the Teeth.

The anæsthetics used during the extraction of teeth may be divided into two classes, viz.:—general and local. It is not proposed to make any allusion to the methods of administering general anæsthetics, as they hardly fall within the scope of this volume. There are, however, a few points which the operator should bear in mind when employing them and which may with advantage be briefly dwelt upon, but before considering these, a word or two may not be out of place with regard to the choice of the anæsthetic. In dental practice three agents are generally used, nitrous oxide alone or in combination with air or oxygen, ether and chloroform.

In the very large majority of dental operations nitrous oxide is to be preferred to ether and chloroform, and possesses the great advantage over them of being practically safe. In addition, the administration of nitrous oxide occupies a{57} shorter period, and the recovery is rapid and complete. Within the last few years, combinations of nitrous oxide with oxygen and with air have been introduced by Dr. Hewitt and Mr. Rowell respectively, and both combinations possess advantages over nitrous oxide used alone.

The advantages of nitrous oxide and oxygen over nitrous oxide alone are:—

(1) The anæsthesia is quieter.

(2) The mucous membranes of the mouth do not swell to the same extent, and the operator therefore gains a clearer view of the tooth.

(3) The period of anæsthesia is lengthened, perhaps by only a few seconds, but the quieter condition of the patient assists indirectly in prolonging the period for operating.

The advantages of nitrous oxide with air over nitrous oxide alone are somewhat similar to those of nitrous oxide and oxygen, though less marked.

For operations requiring a long anæsthesia, such as the extraction of a difficult third molar, ether should be used, the administration being commenced with nitrous oxide. In such cases many operators prefer to use chloroform, but the regular employment of this agent in dental surgery is to be severely condemned, and the cases are rare indeed in which its use is called for. A most careful inquiry into this important subject has been made by Dr. Hewitt, and the results of his{58} work were communicated in an exhaustive paper published in the Journal of the British Dental Association for November, 1895, which is well worthy the perusal of all those who are in the habit of administering chloroform.

Whenever a general anæsthetic is given for the removal of teeth, two people should always be present, one to confine his attention solely to the administration of the anæsthetic, the other to the removal of the tooth, as it is impossible for one person to operate and at the same time to observe the condition of the patient during the anæsthetic period. This rule should be strictly adhered to.

For extraction under nitrous oxide, and also to a great extent under ether, the positions of the patients should differ but little if at all from those already advocated, with this exception, it is advisable not to have the head too far back. Before the administration of the anæsthetic is commenced, any removable artificial teeth that may be in the mouth should be taken out; the operator should decide exactly what he intends to do; at the same time it is well not to attempt too much and to avoid pricking the gum during the examination of any roots that it may be necessary to extract. The prop should be placed on sound firm teeth in such a position that the operator can work without being hindered by it, and a final view of the mouth should be taken. Where{59} several teeth have to be extracted at one sitting, their order of removal should be decided upon before the operation is commenced, and if any particular tooth is causing pain, it should be extracted first. The order of removal should also as far as possible be arranged so that changes of instruments are reduced to a minimum. As a rule, lower teeth should be extracted before upper teeth, because if the latter are removed first, the blood may pass down and so obscure the lower ones. Roots should be removed before whole teeth for the same reason. Each tooth or root must be cleared from the mouth before any attempt is made to remove another except in cases where the gum is thoroughly adherent; under this condition the tooth or root may be left and freed from the gum when the patient has recovered. With teeth which have a liability to slip out from between the blades of the forceps, it is well as a precaution to keep a finger of the left hand behind the blades to prevent the tooth passing backwards should it slip out.

LOCAL ANÆSTHETICS.

(a) Cocaine.—The most efficacious of the local anæsthetics in use is cocaine. It is an alkaloid obtained from the dry leaves of Erythroxylon Coca, and in practice the hydrochlorate form is{60} generally used. For the removal of teeth it is necessary to inject a solution of the drug into the tissues, a simple application to the gum being of little use. Cocaine has the reputation of not being thoroughly reliable in its action, but this in a great measure often arises from want of care in injecting it. Not more than half a grain should be injected for the removal of a tooth, and even then with people of feeble health, untoward symptoms may supervene.

Mode of Employment.—A fresh solution of the drug should be made each time its use is called for, by dissolving a tabloid weighing half a grain in 5 minims of distilled water. Half of the solution should be injected into the gum on each side of the alveolus. The gum being such a dense tissue, the solution should be injected slowly, otherwise the bulk of it will escape by the side of the needle into the mouth. As there is always a tendency for this to happen even when the solution is slowly injected, it is well to keep a finger of the left hand pressed on the gum where the needle is inserted.

Speaking personally, I usually occupy about eight minutes over the injection, and wait for four or five minutes after its completion before operating. As a local anæsthetic I have generally found cocaine satisfactory, so far as its anæsthetic properties are concerned, but the occasional appearance of toxic symptoms, especially in those of{61} feeble health, should not be lost sight of. Tropacocaine has been recommended as possessing the anæsthetic properties of cocaine without giving rise to toxic effects, but in practice I have not found these statements fully borne out.

Toxic Effects.—The administration of cocaine, especially if given in large doses, may be followed by well-marked toxic effects of which the following are cited by Dr. Hewitt.[4]

“Headache; vertigo; pallor; a cold, moist skin; a feeble, slow, or rapid pulse, becoming imperceptible in grave cases; incoherence of speech; nausea; vomiting; unconsciousness; trismus and other muscular spasms; epileptiform attacks; dilated or unequal pupils; and disturbances of respiration, culminating in dyspnœa and asphyxia.” The treatment of cocaine poisoning should be directed first to restoring the circulation by the administration of a rapidly acting stimulant, such as sal-volatile, brandy, or the hypodermic injection of ether. The patient should be placed in the horizontal position, and the respiration watched for; should this tend to fail, artificial respiration must be immediately resorted to.

(b) Freezing Agents.—This group includes such preparations as chloride of ethyl, coryl (a mixture{62} of chloride of ethyl and chloride of methyl in such proportions that the mixture boils at 0° C.) and anestile. Generally speaking, the anæsthesia produced is by no means satisfactory, and to use them to the greatest advantage, attention must be given to the following points:—

(1) The gums must be well dried, and as far as possible all neighbouring regions, such as the cheeks or tongue, protected by napkins or other suitable material.

(2) The gums must be thoroughly frozen before commencing to operate.

(3) The extraction must be carried out as quickly as is consistent with thoroughness.

(4) If possible the spray should be continued during the operation.

(5) Too great a jet should not be used.

Freezing agents can be employed much better for front than for back teeth, in fact it is found at times difficult to freeze the gums at all satisfactorily at the back of the mouth.{63}

CHAPTER V.
———
Difficulties, Complications and Sequelæ of Extraction of the Teeth.

Like all other surgical operations, the extraction of teeth is at times attended with certain difficulties, complications and sequelæ which for the sake of description will be considered under the following headings:

(1) Difficulties, complications and sequelæ connected with the teeth themselves.

(2) Difficulties, complications and sequelæ connected with the jaws.

(3) Difficulties, complications and sequelæ connected with the soft parts.

(4) Difficulties, complications and sequelæ arising during extraction under anæsthetics.

(5) Miscellaneous complications, difficulties and sequelæ.

(1) DIFFICULTIES, COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELÆ CONNECTED WITH THE TEETH THEMSELVES.

(a) Undue Resistance of the tooth and{64} alveolus.—Considerable resistance to our efforts to remove a tooth at times occurs. This is naturally most often, though by no means always, met with in those of strong physique. Teeth isolated are always firmer than those in series; this is accounted for by a consolidation of the bone around them. Experience will act as a guide, and it is to a certain extent possible, after a little observation, to gather from the general appearance of a tooth if it will give more than normal trouble in removal. Should undue resistance be met with, steady attempts to move the tooth slightly in different directions should be made and persevered with; if this precaution is not taken and too much force is used in any one direction, fracture of the tooth or alveolus is sure to result. It may, perhaps, be found impossible to remove the tooth; when this is the case it is best to dismiss the patient and to make a fresh attempt two or three days later; the tooth will then probably be loose, as a result of the inflammation which has been set up by the previous attempt at extraction, and can be easily removed.

The causes of undue resistance are:—

(i.) Abnormal density of the alveolar process.

(ii.) Divergent and twisted roots.

(iii.) Alteration in the shapes of the roots brought about by periodontal inflammation (exostosis).

(b) Fracture of the tooth.—The principal causes of this accident are:—{65}

(i.) The use of badly fitting forceps.

(ii.) The use of unnecessary or wrongly applied force in attempting to loosen the tooth in its socket.

A tooth having been fractured, the patient should be made to rinse the mouth until the bleeding has ceased, the socket should be dried with cotton-wool, and the position and edge of the root defined with a probe before attempting to remove the fractured portion. It is neglect of these steps that so often leads to failure to remove the remaining portion of a fractured root. Too many attempts to remove a fractured root should not be made; if a second endeavour proves fruitless, the patient should be dismissed and a fresh attempt, if necessary, made after a period of one or two days, as the tooth will probably then be looser from inflammatory trouble, moreover, the hæmorrhage having ceased, it will be possible to obtain a clearer view of the root. Before, however, dismissing the patient, an anodyne mouth wash should be prescribed, and the pulp if exposed touched with carbolic or nitric acid. The lower third of a root may generally be left without fear of unpleasant consequences; but it is always well to inform the patient when any portion of a tooth is allowed to remain in the jaw, as such knowledge may be of assistance should any trouble arise at a subsequent date.

(c) Crowded and irregular teeth.—The removal{66} of these has already been referred to in Chapter III.

(d) The Removal of the wrong tooth.—The removal of the wrong tooth may occur and is naturally due to carelessness on the part of the operator. Should this accident arise, the tooth must be immediately replaced and if necessary secured with a ligature. If the pulp subsequently shows signs of degeneration or inflammation it should be removed and the canal treated and filled.

(e) Removal of a neighbouring tooth.—This may occur and is generally due to a crowded arrangement of the teeth. The accident seems to occur most frequently with the removal of the first permanent lower molar, the neighbouring tooth usually involved being the second bicuspid which is simultaneously dislocated from its socket. This accident can be avoided by placing the thumb on the tooth which shows a tendency to move, and exerting only as much force in the removal of the tooth which is being extracted as can be controlled by the thumb. If a neighbouring tooth is removed it must be replaced and treated in the same manner as described above.

(f) Removal of an unerupted bicuspid.—This may be an avoidable or an unavoidable accident. At times the developing bicuspid is so firmly embraced by the roots of the deciduous molar that{67} during the extraction of the latter tooth the bicuspid is removed—such an accident cannot be avoided. It is an avoidable accident when it occurs during the extraction of the roots of a temporary molar and arises from using too much force. As previously pointed out it is best to leave the fractured roots of temporary molars alone unless they can be easily removed.

(g) Breaking one tooth in extracting another.—In the extraction of lower teeth with hawk’s-bill forceps the upper teeth may be fractured. This accident is most likely to occur to the inexperienced, and arises from the tooth leaving its socket suddenly, due frequently to the extracting force being used in an upward rather than an outward direction. It may, however, occur when a lower tooth has been more than normally resistant. In all such cases it is well for the operator to be on guard by keeping the thumb or a finger of the left hand over the joint of the forceps.

Also in using the elevator an adjacent tooth may be fractured.

(2) DIFFICULTIES, COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELÆ CONNECTED WITH THE JAWS.

(a) Fracture.—The fracture and removal of a small piece of the alveolus is not an unfrequent accident which is fortunately by no means serious. It is sometimes unavoidable but at other times is due to getting the blades of the forceps on the{68} outer sides of the alveolus instead of between the bone and the root of the tooth.

Extensive fracture is sometimes seen, for instance in a case that came under my notice at the Dental Hospital of London an unqualified person in removing the first lower right permanent molar fractured the bone in a horizontal direction so that the second and first bicuspids with the canine were completely separated from the body of the bone. Mr. Salter[5] gives an account of an extensive fracture of the jaw which occurred in a lady æt. 35. The fracture occurred in connection with the removal of the superior central incisors. The right central incisor required some force for its removal, and when it came away the whole of the front of the alveolus was firmly attached to the root. In removing the left central incisor considerable force was required during the exertion of which the bone was fractured. On examination of the parts the mass of bone corresponding to the intermaxillary bone was found to be merely held in place by the soft tissues. “A vertical fracture extended from the side of the canine up to the root of the nose, then nearly horizontally across to the opposite side, being connected there with another vertical fracture. The lesion passed completely through the jaw from before backwards, and there{69} was a wound in the palate three quarters of an inch from the alveolar border, through which was considerable hæmorrhage.” A still more severe example of fracture during extraction of teeth is recorded by Mr. Cattlin,[6] where in an attempt to remove a third upper molar with an elevator the tuberosity of the maxilla, a portion of the floor of the antrum and part of the sphenoid were fractured.

Fracture of the maxilla tuberosity may occur during the removal of the third upper molar, and Mr. Nicol[7] records such an accident during the removal of the second upper permanent molar. In a case recorded by Mr. L. Matheson[8] a transverse fracture of the maxilla occurred in a line between the first and second permanent molars during the removal of the first-named tooth.

Direct transverse fracture of the horizontal ramus of the mandible due to extraction of the teeth has also been recorded.

Treatment.—In fracture of small portions of the alveolar process, no special treatment is called for except that all loose fragments should be removed. When the fracture is of a more extensive character, the fragments must be retained in position by a suitable form of splint, a description of which will be found in most works on dental surgery.{70}

(b) Necrosis of the alveolus may result from extraction and is generally the result of undue violence or of some septic process occurring in the wound. The treatment to be followed consists of the use of antiseptic and deodorant mouth washes; the necrosed bone when quite separated from the living tissue should be removed with a pair of suitable forceps.

(c) Dislocation of the mandible.—The use of too much force in extracting a lower tooth and not at the same time counteracting the force by supporting the chin, may lead to unilateral or bilateral dislocation of the mandible. This accident may also be brought about by forcing the mouth open too much with a Mason’s gag during the administration of an anæsthetic. It may likewise occur without the employment of undue force in those who have previously met with or are liable to dislocation.

Reduction may be brought about by placing the thumbs, carefully wrapped in a napkin, on the molar teeth and the palmar surfaces of the fingers below the chin. If downward pressure is then made with the thumbs, and upward pressure with the fingers, the condyles of the mandible will generally pass back easily into the glenoid cavity. In cases where more difficulty than this is experienced, the patient should be placed in a recumbent position, and corks should be inserted between the{71} back teeth. Upward pressure should then be applied on the under surface of the chin. It is advisable, after reduction, for the patient to wear a four-tailed bandage for about a week.

(d) Forcing a root into the antrum.—This accident occurs mostly in connection with the extraction of the second upper bicuspid root and buccal roots of the first upper permanent molar. If a root has been so dislocated into the antral cavity as to still partly remain in its socket, the best course to pursue is to leave it alone and not to attempt removal as the attempt might only result in complete dislocation of the root into the antrum. The socket should be kept quite clean by the continual use of antiseptic washes. As a rule the root gives rise to no subsequent trouble.

When a root has been forced completely into the antrum, the latter should be enlarged and the antral cavity thoroughly syringed. For this purpose it is well to use an aural syringe of five or six ounce capacity. The rationale of this form of treatment is that the root may pass out with the return current from the antrum. If this treatment fails, an attempt may be made to remove the root with a little scoop of gutta-percha fixed on to a flexible wire. When it cannot be removed in this manner, the cavity should be thoroughly irrigated with an antiseptic solution and the root left alone, as it will in all probability become encysted and{72} not give rise to any subsequent trouble. If, however, the patient has a history of epitheliomatous disease of the jaws further attempts should be made to remove it. A case where a tooth was forced into the antrum in a patient with a family history of epithelioma of the jaw is recorded in the Transactions of the Odontological Society, vol. ii., page 15, old series.

(e) Forcing a tooth into an abscess cavity.—This accident may occur; if it does, it requires similar treatment to the accident just described in connection with the antrum.

(f) Trismus.—Inability to open the mouth naturally renders extraction of the teeth more difficult than usual. When, however, the closure is the result of inflammatory trouble in connection with the lower molars, an anæsthetic should be given and the mouth opened forcibly with a Mason’s gag. If the trismus is the result of tonic contraction of the muscles closing the jaw, ether should be used in order to overcome the resistance of the muscles, as nitrous oxide would not have the desired effect.

(3) DIFFICULTIES, COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELÆ IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFT TISSUES.

(a) Extensive laceration of the gum.—In cases where a tooth has given rise to much trouble in removal, the soft tissues naturally suffer, but apart{73} from this they may be severely lacerated when the gum is more than usually adherent to a tooth. This is most frequently seen in the removal of the lower third molar, but it is also sometimes met with in the removal of loose teeth. When the gum is found more than usually adherent the tooth should be left in the socket until the gum attachment has been divided with a pair of scissors or a lancet. Continued attempts to remove the tooth with the forceps before the gum has been divided will only lead to undue laceration.

In all cases where the gums have been badly lacerated, an anodyne mouth wash should be prescribed.

(b) Wounding the tongue.—This is most likely to occur under nitrous oxide, as the tongue during anæsthesia is generally swollen, and is, moreover, not under the control of the patient. Wounding the tongue is nearly always due to carelessness, and arises generally in using the elevator. When the tongue is much lacerated, the overhanging portions should be trimmed off with scissors and the surface kept clean with antiseptic mouth washes. If the tongue is punctured and the wound does not involve a large branch of the lingual artery, but yet bleeds freely, the tongue should be drawn forward; if this does not prove successful the insertion of a stitch will generally cause the hæmorrhage to cease. If the tongue is punctured and a large branch of the lingual{74} artery is involved, the finger should be placed on the back of the tongue and the organ drawn forward; this compresses the lingual artery against the hyoid bone. The bleeding point must then be sought for and, if found, an attempt made to twist the wounded vessel. If this fails cauterisation may be tried, and as a last resource, if cauterisation does not stop the bleeding, the lingual artery must be tied.

(c) Bruising the lower lips.—This may occur in the removal of upper bicuspids and molars, and is due to having the mouth insufficiently opened, and using forceps of too straight a pattern.

(d) Injury of the mandibular nerve.—The mandibular nerve may be injured during the removal of the lower molars and bicuspids. Loss of sensation over the parts supplied by the nerve, with dribbling of saliva, generally follows the accident. Sensation is, however, usually restored, and in cases of laceration the nerve generally unites.

Mr. Sewill records a case in which “the roots of a lower wisdom tooth contained a groove and a foramen, through which the inferior dental nerve had evidently passed.”

(e) Hæmorrhage following tooth extraction is a most important complication, and one which needs prompt treatment. Hæmorrhage is predisposed to by a diathesis known as hæmophylia. Of{75} its pathology but little seems to be definitely known. The blood in this condition is said by Walsham to be deficient in fibrin. Hæmorrhage may occur in people not predisposed to the above-named diathesis; in some instances it is probably due to pathological changes in the artery supplying the tooth, these changes being frequently induced by inflammation around the apex of the root, and the vessel becoming adherent to its bony surrounding, and thus prevented from contracting. Another condition, which may or may not have any practical bearing, is the occurrence of hæmorrhage during the menstrual period. I have, on two occasions, had under notice patients for whom teeth have been extracted during this period, and in whom hæmorrhage followed, but ceased at the termination of the period. Teeth had been extracted for both these patients on previous occasions, without undue hæmorrhage following.

Hæmorrhage is generally divided into three stages, viz.:—primary, intermediate and secondary. In the mouth we often find the primary running into the intermediate. The treatment of primary hæmorrhage, or that occurring at the time of the operation, is not of serious import. If it is at all sharp a useful plan is to give the patient some tincture of hamamelis in the water used for rinsing the mouth. At the same time about fifteen grains{76} of gallic acid[9] should be given, and the patient should be ordered to take a similar quantity every two or three hours until the hæmorrhage ceases. The socket should also be loosely plugged with cotton-wool dipped in some styptic, such as gallic acid.

Intermediate and secondary hæmorrhage is of a more serious nature, and generally sets in at night. When a case of intermediate hæmorrhage is first seen, these two important points should be ascertained before treating it:—first, whether the bleeding is coming from the gums or the socket of the tooth; secondly, whether the blood shows a tendency to coagulation. The latter point will act as a guide in the choice of drugs for internal administration.

In hæmorrhage from the gum search should be made for any small vessels that may be the cause of it, and if found they should be twisted or compressed. If the vessel is only partially divided it should be completely severed, as this will probably allow contraction to take place. If the bleeding is capillary in character, a pad of gutta-percha lined with lint dipped in some styptic and applied with firm pressure is usually sufficient to stop it.[10]

{77}

When the bleeding proceeds from the socket the following mode of procedure is adopted: some small cone-shaped pieces of non-absorbent cotton-wool are prepared (each about ⅓ to ½ inch long and ¼ inch broad at the base), also a pad of lint and a four-tailed bandage; a syringe, a pair of conveying forceps, some cold water and the chosen styptic are likewise placed ready for use. The socket is first freed from clot, then syringed, then dried out with a pledget of cotton-wool, and directly afterwards one of the cone-shaped pieces of cotton-wool dipped in the styptic (the most useful being tannin) is placed in the socket and forced to the apex, with a fair amount of pressure; the hæmorrhage is arrested far more by pressure than by the styptic. More pledgets of wool are inserted until the socket is quite full; a plug of lint is then placed over all and kept in position by antagonism with the upper teeth, a four-tailed bandage being used for this purpose. An excellent method of keeping the plug in the socket if the approximal teeth are standing is to wedge a piece of wood between them. Excellent as this plan is, however, if the hæmorrhage is at all sharp it is better to use the four-tailed bandage to make more certain of retaining the plug in{78} position. The number of pledgets of wool inserted in the socket should be counted.

The general directions to be given to the patient, though apparently trivial, are most important and should never be forgotten. He or she should be advised to go home very quietly, to avoid all forms of excitement, to assume the sitting position usual during the day, and to use a high pillow at night. The patient should be fed through a bent tube, and all fluids should be given cold.

In addition to plugging the socket, hæmostatics should be administered internally.

In cases where there is a thin watery blood and no tendency to coagulation it may be fairly assumed that the cause of the hæmorrhage lies in the blood, and such drugs as gallic acid[11] and perchloride of iron[12] are indicated, but when the blood shows a marked tendency to coagulate in the mouth, as often happens, and the bleeding still continues, such{79} drugs as ergot[13] are indicated; in this latter condition it may be assumed that the cause of the hæmorrhage lies in some want of contractility of the vessel wall, and ergot causes contraction of unstriped muscular tissue.

At the time of plugging the socket a dose of gallic acid, perchloride of iron or ergot should be given, and its administration continued at intervals until the bleeding ceases. Mr. Morton Smale prefers a hypodermic injection of ergotine.[14]

The patient should be seen within twenty-four hours after treatment, and if the bleeding has ceased the plugs may be removed and an antiseptic mouth wash prescribed. This course is not recommended when the hæmorrhage has been severe; under such circumstances the plugs should be allowed to work themselves out. If the hæmorrhage has not then ceased, the socket should be replugged tighter than before with a plug of wood wrapped in non-absorbent cotton-wool. Should this prove of no avail the actual cautery may be tried; if this fails, and the bleeding is from the mandible, the canal{80} should be trephined and a plug of ivory inserted, so as to compress the artery against the inner plate of the bone. In uncontrollable hæmorrhage from the maxilla digital pressure on the common carotid opposite the transverse process of the sixth cervical vertebra may be tried; should this fail to stop the hæmorrhage, ligature of that vessel must be resorted to.

In one case of hæmorrhage from the region of the third right lower molar Mr. Boyd[15] divided the lip in the median line and reflected the cheek from the jaw. The mandibular canal was then laid open by excising the outer plate of the bone, and the bleeding was arrested by plugging the mesial and distal ends of the canal.

In extreme cases, with sign of collapse, normal saline solution[16] must be infused into the median basilic vein.

In patients predisposed to hæmorrhage extraction should be if possible avoided; but, if the removal of the tooth be absolutely necessary, prophylactic treatment should be pursued for three or four days previous to the operation by the administration of one or other of the remedies previously mentioned.

A new styptic, consisting of fibrin ferment 1 to 10 to which 1 per cent. of calcium chloride has{81} been added, is said by Walsham to act only on the blood, not on the tissues, and to be perfectly aseptic. It was found to be effectual in arresting hæmorrhage after the division of all the veins except the common jugular in a dog’s neck.

The tooth should be extracted in the early morning, as we then have the day before us should hæmorrhage occur. Some hæmostatic should be administered at the time of the operation and the socket plugged at once; for it is most important to remember that in these cases it is far easier to prevent the hæmorrhage occurring than to arrest it when once it has commenced. The subsequent treatment will consist in the continued administration of hæmostatic drugs.

(f) Injury of the arteries in the neighbourhood of the teeth.—Wound of the lingual artery has been referred to under the heading of injuries to the tongue. Laceration of the ranine, anterior and posterior palatine arteries may also occur. Such accidents are usually the result of the forceps slipping and are therefore avoidable. Treatment consists in pressure or in twisting or tying the divided vessel. In the case of the anterior or posterior palatine artery it may be found necessary to plug the foramina which give passage to these vessels.

(g) Pain following tooth extraction.—The{82} causes giving rise to pain following the extraction of a tooth are:—

(1) Incomplete extraction of the tooth, more especially when the remaining portion contains an exposed pulp.

(2) Too rapid healing of the orifice of the socket.—It sometimes happens that the margins of the wound left after extraction unite very early, and when this occurs the discharges which naturally come away from the granulating surface at the base of the socket, have no exit; the consequence is that they are retained and set up a local traumatic inflammation, leading to swelling of the surrounding tissue.

(3) Suppuration in the tooth socket.—This may be due in the first instance to the use of dirty forceps, and under such circumstances it may be classed as a poisoned wound. An examination will reveal the presence of greenish putrid pus, while the tissue around will be much inflamed, and the portion immediately bordering the wound will have a tendency to slough. A condition of this kind is often seen in hospital nurses and medical students and is no doubt due to infection met with in their daily duties.

Suppuration in the socket may be due to a lowered vitality of the tissue, produced by some such local causes as acute or chronic inflammation, and is especially well seen in cases of extraction{83} for the relief of periodontitis, or where the operation has been performed in patients suffering from general debility, syphilis, struma or in fact any of those systemic diseases which tend to lower the vitality of the organism.

(4) Extensive laceration of the hard and soft tissues in the neighbourhood of the socket; and

(5) Necrosis of the socket of the tooth are also fruitful sources of pain following tooth extraction.

(6) The presence in the wound of a foreign body.—A curious example of this came under notice a few years ago. A patient applied for the extraction of the left first permanent molar. During the operation a portion of one of the cusps disappeared; a search was made for it but, as it was not found, the natural supposition was that it had been removed in rinsing the mouth. The patient for the next three weeks complained of slight pain in the socket for which remedies were tried but proved of little use. Eventually the patient discovered the cusp on the top of the granulation tissue which had filled up the socket. In another case of the same character which came under notice, the offending material was a piece of an amalgam filling. A fractured blade of forceps may likewise act as the offending body.

(7) Injury to the nerve.—Direct injury to the trunk of the nerve is more likely to occur during extraction of the lower third molar than with any{84} other tooth. It is more than probable that many obscure cases of pain following tooth extraction are due to exposure and irritation of the nerve at the apex of the socket. An interesting case of this character was lately reported by Mr. Storer Bennett.[17] The patient, a lady æt. 23, had had the third upper molar dislocated through the use of a Wood’s gag, and, as it was considered hopeless to restore the dislocated tooth, it was extracted without difficulty. The socket in spite of treatment remained painful for the next twelve days, but in the meanwhile granulated healthily, except at its apex, where by the aid of a mirror and probe a spot about the size of a pin’s head was noticed which caused the greatest agony on being touched. Incision of the nerve produced permanent relief.

Treatment.—The treatment naturally depends very much upon the cause. A thorough examination of the socket should be made with probe and mirror. When due to incomplete extraction, another attempt, if considered advisable, may be made to remove the tooth. This proving unsuccessful, the socket should be swabbed with an anodyne drug and, if there is an exposed pulp in the remaining portion of the tooth, the pulp should be touched with fuming nitric acid or strong{85} carbolic acid. The patient should also be advised to use some poppy head fomentation.[18]

In too rapid healing of the orifice of the socket, the freshly healed surface must be separated, the socket syringed out, and a small tent of lint allowed to remain in the orifice for about twelve hours. An antiseptic mouth wash should also be prescribed.

In those cases where the pus is putrid and there is reason to suspect infection, the socket should be thoroughly syringed with some antiseptic such as hyd. perchlor. 1 in 1,000, carbolic acid 1 in 40; following this the parts should be carefully dried with cotton-wool. A small piece of chloride of zinc should then be introduced and allowed to dissolve in the socket, which must be subsequently kept aseptic by constant irrigation with some antiseptic solution.

Suppuration is most frequently seen after extraction of the lower teeth owing to the fact that drainage is less easily effected than in the upper, owing to the dependent position of the socket. In many cases it will be found necessary to plug the socket tightly with non-absorbent cotton-wool dipped in an antiseptic solution; this prevents the accumulation of débris which would act as an{86} irritant. In cases of suppuration occurring in patients of diminished vitality a tonic form of treatment should be prescribed;[19] the dressing in the socket should be removed two or three times a day and the socket syringed.

Care must be exercised in applying escharotics to sockets to which the nerve may be in close proximity; this is especially necessary in dealing with impacted lower third molars. Two cases illustrating this point have come under my notice. In the first a second lower bicuspid with a long standing chronic abscess had been removed. The patient complained of pain, the socket was syringed out and a small piece of chloride of zinc inserted. Intense agonizing pain followed which all local anodynes failed to relieve. In the second case an impacted right lower third molar had been removed. The socket suppurated, and the pain although severe was not intense. Treatment similar to that used in the first case was adopted with similar results. Since then in all cases where it is possible that the trunk of the nerve may be in close proximity to the socket, I have{87} used non-irritating antiseptic injections and plugged the socket with cotton-wool dipped in tincture of opium with much more satisfactory results.

It is advisable to inform the patient of the possibility of pain following the extraction of a tooth, especially after periodontitis, and in all cases where a large number of teeth have been extracted a mouth-wash[20] should be prescribed; for, even if there is no pain, it will prevent the discharge from the sockets of the teeth undergoing putrefactive changes.

In pain due to necrosis of the socket deodorant antiseptic injections must be used, while in extensive laceration of the soft and hard parts an anodyne mouth-wash[21] may be tried. In all obscure cases an application should be made to the socket of some local anodyne such as tincture of opium{88} or cocaine, and a mouth wash having similar properties should at the same time be prescribed.

(4) DIFFICULTIES, COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELÆ ARISING DURING EXTRACTION UNDER ANÆSTHETICS.

(a) Tongue slipping back.—During extraction under anæsthetics the tongue not being under control may slip over the larynx, or may be forcibly pushed back by the fingers of the operator. Symptoms of difficult breathing or even arrest of respiration will follow this accident. It is not enough to watch the chest walls, as respiratory movement may continue without air entering the lungs. Treatment consists in pulling the tongue forcibly forward with a suitable instrument and forcibly extending the head on the spinal column.

(b) Forcing out a tooth with a prop or a Mason’s gag.—With a prop this accident may arise from resting it upon teeth which are loose or from placing it in such a way that undue leverage is brought to bear on the teeth. It is an accident most likely to occur when the prop is fixed on the front teeth and the mouth opened to its widest extent. Under such conditions undue leverage at right angles to the long axis of the tooth is brought to bear upon the palatal surfaces of the upper teeth and they are consequently forced outwards. With a Mason’s gag the accident{89} is due at times to clumsiness; great care should therefore be exercised when using this very powerful instrument. If a tooth is forced out it should if possible be immediately replaced.

(c) Passage of a foreign body through the isthmus of the fauces.—A foreign body, such as a tooth, a broken piece of forceps or a prop, passing through the isthmus of the fauces may become impacted in either the air or food passages.

In the air passages it may lodge (1) over the entrance of the larynx, (2) in the larynx, (3) in the trachea or bronchus.

In the food passages it may lodge (1) in the pharynx, (2) in the œsophagus, (3) at the pyloric opening of the stomach.

In the air passages.—Should the foreign body lodge over the entrance of or in the larynx the patient will be seized with a violent fit of coughing which may expel it; but, should this not happen, symptoms of asphyxia will supervene. With regard to treatment; the head should immediately be brought forward and the finger inserted along the side of the mouth into the pharynx, and then given a forward sweeping movement; by this means the foreign body, if lodged at the back of the tongue, will probably be removed. This failing, the patient must if possible be inverted and a forcible slap given on the back. If the foreign body is not dislodged by this method, laryngotomy{90} should be immediately performed. There must be no hesitation about the performance of this operation and it must be carried out promptly, for the longer it is delayed the less becomes the chance of saving the life of the patient.

A foreign body in the trachea or bronchus may give rise to no immediate symptoms, but generally a violent fit of coughing, with signs of impending asphyxia, takes place at the time of the accident. These signs pass away, to be followed at intervals by fresh attacks of coughing and eventually by symptoms of collapse of the lung or lungs.

In a case recorded by Sir William MacCormac,[22] during the removal of an upper bicuspid the palatine blade of the forceps snapped off close to the joint and disappeared. The patient immediately suffered from great dyspnœa and appeared to be dying. The symptoms passed away, and for the following six weeks the patient’s condition gave no great cause for anxiety, although she suffered from a constant hacking cough accompanied by bloody expectoration. Seven weeks after the accident she was admitted into St. Thomas’s Hospital, the foreign body was with difficulty removed from the right bronchus, and the patient made an excellent recovery.{91}

The diagnosis of a foreign body in one bronchus is made by an absence of signs of respiration over the whole or part of the lung on that side, with exaggerated sounds (puerile breathing) over the opposite side. Treatment consists in performing tracheotomy and removing the foreign body.

In the food passages.—A foreign body impacted in the pharynx will give rise to pain, symptoms of dysphagia and dyspnœa. A hacking cough is generally present.

Should a foreign body be suspected in the pharynx, its presence can usually be ascertained by digital exploration; this failing, the cavity should be examined by the aid of a laryngoscope.

An attempt should first be made to remove the body with the fingers, and if this is unsuccessful pharyngeal forceps must be called into use. In some cases where the impaction is very firm it may be necessary to perform pharyngotomy.

A foreign body in the œsophagus will cause dysphagia, and will probably give rise to constant pain; if it is situated in the upper part it will in all probability give rise to dyspnœa. On applying the stethoscope over the region of the œsophagus, a gurgling sound will be heard when the patient swallows fluids. The presence of a foreign body may be definitely ascertained by passing a bougie; this step will also enable the surgeon to determine the position in which the foreign body is lodged.{92}

If impacted in the upper part of the œsophagus, an attempt may be made to remove the impacted body with forceps; this failing, œsophagotomy must be performed.

If lodged near the cardiac end of the œsophagus an attempt may be made with a bougie to push the foreign body into the stomach; this failing, gastrotomy should be performed.

If a foreign body becomes impacted at the pyloric opening of the stomach, it will give rise to gastric dilatation. Under such circumstances the stomach must be emptied of its contents, and gastrotomy then performed.

A foreign body going through the isthmus of the fauces will as a rule pass into the œsophagus, then into the stomach, and will give rise to no trouble.

The details of such operations as gastrotomy, œsophagotomy, &c., do not lie within the scope of this book, and should be sought for in works dealing with general surgery.

The necessity of being ready for such emergencies as the above cannot be too fully emphasised, and all who administer anæsthetics should be provided with the instruments necessary to perform laryngotomy. These should be kept in a little case, and no anæsthetic should be administered without the case being near at hand. Adherence to this rule is important.{93}

(5) MISCELLANEOUS DIFFICULTIES, COMPLICATIONS AND SEQUELÆ.

(a) Uterine pain.—A case is quoted by Mr. Sercombe where extraction of a tooth was followed by paroxysmal uterine pain, followed by the cure of an obstinate leucorrhœa.[23]

(b) Shock.—The fact that tooth extraction is a surgical operation, and may be followed by shock, is often overlooked. The amount of shock which follows as a rule is practically nil, but at times, especially in the weak, it may be well marked. This is not taken sufficiently into account when a question arises as to the number of teeth to be extracted at one sitting, and it should be clearly borne in mind that what a strong, able-bodied person, can stand, one of weaker physique cannot bear. The wholesale extraction of teeth at one sitting which is carried out by some operators is not advisable, and the amount of prostration that follows is sometimes very severe.

Syncope at the time of the operation sometimes occurs. Should it supervene during the extraction of the tooth the operator should immediately desist until recovery ensues. Fainting is best treated by bending the head down towards the knees, at the same time loosening anything tight about the neck and applying ordinary salts of{94} ammonia to the nose. In severe cases the patient should be removed from the chair and laid on the floor, and the chest should be exposed and flipped with a towel dipped in cold water. In more severe cases it may be necessary to inject ether or some other stimulant, such as brandy. Fatal syncope following tooth extraction has occurred, and a case which took place at Marseilles in 1881 is mentioned by Tomes.[24] The patient was a female, and an attempt was made to remove a tooth, but was desisted in owing to alarming syncope. A second attempt was made, or rather about to be made, when fatal syncope ensued. Post-mortem examination showed nothing beyond a slight amount of cerebral congestion.

(c) Epilepsy.—In those pre-disposed to epilepsy an attack often commences immediately after the extraction of a tooth. In the event of a fit occurring the patient should be removed from the chair and placed on the floor, the clothes being at the same time loosened, and a wedge of wood or some suitable material placed between the teeth to prevent injury to the tongue.

(d) Hysteria.—Manifestations of this disorder at times follow tooth extraction, but do not call for any special treatment beyond that usually adopted for this disorder.{95}

(e) Septic and infective sequelæ.—Scattered through dental literature will be found a large number of records of septic and infective diseases which have followed the extraction of teeth. In many of these cases it would be difficult to say that the infection was always the result of the operation; in a number of them the actual cause was due to the neglected condition of the tooth which called for extraction. Infection can, however, at times undoubtedly be traced to the operation, and once again attention cannot be too strongly drawn to the fact that antiseptic precautions should be carried out as far as possible.

Suppuration of the socket and its appropriate treatment has already been dwelt upon (page 82). Cases of syphilis having been acquired through the use of infected forceps are recorded, while septicæmia, sapræmia, cellulitis, osteitis, osteomyelitis, periostitis, pyæmia, tetanus, have all been known to follow the removal of a tooth, but the treatment of these conditions hardly lies within the scope of this book.{96}

INDEX.

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T, U, W.

{103}

DISEASES AND INJURIES
OF THE TEETH,

Including Pathology and Treatment,

A Manual of Practical Dentistry for Students
and Practitioners.

BY

MORTON SMALE, M.R.C.S., L.S.A., L.D.S.,

Dental Surgeon to St. Mary’s Hospital; Dean of the
School, Dental Hospital of London; Member of Board
of Examiners in Dental Surgery, Royal College of
Surgeons of England.

AND

J. F. COLYER, L.R.C.P., M.R.C.S., L.D.S.,

Dental Surgeon and Lecturer on Dental Surgery to
Charing Cross Hospital and to the Dental Hospital
of London.
———
334 illustrations. 407 pp. and Index. 8vo, cloth.

Price 15s.
———
SUPPLIED BY

CLAUDIUS ASH & SONS, Limited,

5, 6, 7, 8, & 9, BROAD STREET, GOLDEN SQUARE, LONDON, W.

ENGLAND.

End of Project Gutenberg's Extraction of the Teeth, by J. F. Colyer

*** END OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK EXTRACTION OF THE TEETH ***

***** This file should be named 52720-h.htm or 52720-h.zip *****
This and all associated files of various formats will be found in:
        http://www.gutenberg.org/5/2/7/2/52720/

Produced by deaurider, Chuck Greif and the Online
Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This
file was produced from images generously made available
by The Internet Archive)


Updated editions will replace the previous one--the old editions
will be renamed.

Creating the works from public domain print editions means that no
one owns a United States copyright in these works, so the Foundation
(and you!) can copy and distribute it in the United States without
permission and without paying copyright royalties.  Special rules,
set forth in the General Terms of Use part of this license, apply to
copying and distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works to
protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG-tm concept and trademark.  Project
Gutenberg is a registered trademark, and may not be used if you
charge for the eBooks, unless you receive specific permission.  If you
do not charge anything for copies of this eBook, complying with the
rules is very easy.  You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose
such as creation of derivative works, reports, performances and
research.  They may be modified and printed and given away--you may do
practically ANYTHING with public domain eBooks.  Redistribution is
subject to the trademark license, especially commercial
redistribution.



*** START: FULL LICENSE ***

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE
PLEASE READ THIS BEFORE YOU DISTRIBUTE OR USE THIS WORK

To protect the Project Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting the free
distribution of electronic works, by using or distributing this work
(or any other work associated in any way with the phrase "Project
Gutenberg"), you agree to comply with all the terms of the Full Project
Gutenberg-tm License (available with this file or online at
http://gutenberg.org/license).


Section 1.  General Terms of Use and Redistributing Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic works

1.A.  By reading or using any part of this Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work, you indicate that you have read, understand, agree to
and accept all the terms of this license and intellectual property
(trademark/copyright) agreement.  If you do not agree to abide by all
the terms of this agreement, you must cease using and return or destroy
all copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in your possession.
If you paid a fee for obtaining a copy of or access to a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work and you do not agree to be bound by the
terms of this agreement, you may obtain a refund from the person or
entity to whom you paid the fee as set forth in paragraph 1.E.8.

1.B.  "Project Gutenberg" is a registered trademark.  It may only be
used on or associated in any way with an electronic work by people who
agree to be bound by the terms of this agreement.  There are a few
things that you can do with most Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works
even without complying with the full terms of this agreement.  See
paragraph 1.C below.  There are a lot of things you can do with Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works if you follow the terms of this agreement
and help preserve free future access to Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.  See paragraph 1.E below.

1.C.  The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation ("the Foundation"
or PGLAF), owns a compilation copyright in the collection of Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic works.  Nearly all the individual works in the
collection are in the public domain in the United States.  If an
individual work is in the public domain in the United States and you are
located in the United States, we do not claim a right to prevent you from
copying, distributing, performing, displaying or creating derivative
works based on the work as long as all references to Project Gutenberg
are removed.  Of course, we hope that you will support the Project
Gutenberg-tm mission of promoting free access to electronic works by
freely sharing Project Gutenberg-tm works in compliance with the terms of
this agreement for keeping the Project Gutenberg-tm name associated with
the work.  You can easily comply with the terms of this agreement by
keeping this work in the same format with its attached full Project
Gutenberg-tm License when you share it without charge with others.

1.D.  The copyright laws of the place where you are located also govern
what you can do with this work.  Copyright laws in most countries are in
a constant state of change.  If you are outside the United States, check
the laws of your country in addition to the terms of this agreement
before downloading, copying, displaying, performing, distributing or
creating derivative works based on this work or any other Project
Gutenberg-tm work.  The Foundation makes no representations concerning
the copyright status of any work in any country outside the United
States.

1.E.  Unless you have removed all references to Project Gutenberg:

1.E.1.  The following sentence, with active links to, or other immediate
access to, the full Project Gutenberg-tm License must appear prominently
whenever any copy of a Project Gutenberg-tm work (any work on which the
phrase "Project Gutenberg" appears, or with which the phrase "Project
Gutenberg" is associated) is accessed, displayed, performed, viewed,
copied or distributed:

This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever.  You may copy it, give it away or
re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included
with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org/license

1.E.2.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is derived
from the public domain (does not contain a notice indicating that it is
posted with permission of the copyright holder), the work can be copied
and distributed to anyone in the United States without paying any fees
or charges.  If you are redistributing or providing access to a work
with the phrase "Project Gutenberg" associated with or appearing on the
work, you must comply either with the requirements of paragraphs 1.E.1
through 1.E.7 or obtain permission for the use of the work and the
Project Gutenberg-tm trademark as set forth in paragraphs 1.E.8 or
1.E.9.

1.E.3.  If an individual Project Gutenberg-tm electronic work is posted
with the permission of the copyright holder, your use and distribution
must comply with both paragraphs 1.E.1 through 1.E.7 and any additional
terms imposed by the copyright holder.  Additional terms will be linked
to the Project Gutenberg-tm License for all works posted with the
permission of the copyright holder found at the beginning of this work.

1.E.4.  Do not unlink or detach or remove the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License terms from this work, or any files containing a part of this
work or any other work associated with Project Gutenberg-tm.

1.E.5.  Do not copy, display, perform, distribute or redistribute this
electronic work, or any part of this electronic work, without
prominently displaying the sentence set forth in paragraph 1.E.1 with
active links or immediate access to the full terms of the Project
Gutenberg-tm License.

1.E.6.  You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form, including any
word processing or hypertext form.  However, if you provide access to or
distribute copies of a Project Gutenberg-tm work in a format other than
"Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other format used in the official version
posted on the official Project Gutenberg-tm web site (www.gutenberg.org),
you must, at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a
copy, a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy upon
request, of the work in its original "Plain Vanilla ASCII" or other
form.  Any alternate format must include the full Project Gutenberg-tm
License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.

1.E.7.  Do not charge a fee for access to, viewing, displaying,
performing, copying or distributing any Project Gutenberg-tm works
unless you comply with paragraph 1.E.8 or 1.E.9.

1.E.8.  You may charge a reasonable fee for copies of or providing
access to or distributing Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works provided
that

- You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
     the use of Project Gutenberg-tm works calculated using the method
     you already use to calculate your applicable taxes.  The fee is
     owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark, but he
     has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to the
     Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation.  Royalty payments
     must be paid within 60 days following each date on which you
     prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your periodic tax
     returns.  Royalty payments should be clearly marked as such and
     sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation at the
     address specified in Section 4, "Information about donations to
     the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation."

- You provide a full refund of any money paid by a user who notifies
     you in writing (or by e-mail) within 30 days of receipt that s/he
     does not agree to the terms of the full Project Gutenberg-tm
     License.  You must require such a user to return or
     destroy all copies of the works possessed in a physical medium
     and discontinue all use of and all access to other copies of
     Project Gutenberg-tm works.

- You provide, in accordance with paragraph 1.F.3, a full refund of any
     money paid for a work or a replacement copy, if a defect in the
     electronic work is discovered and reported to you within 90 days
     of receipt of the work.

- You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
     distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm works.

1.E.9.  If you wish to charge a fee or distribute a Project Gutenberg-tm
electronic work or group of works on different terms than are set
forth in this agreement, you must obtain permission in writing from
both the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation and Michael
Hart, the owner of the Project Gutenberg-tm trademark.  Contact the
Foundation as set forth in Section 3 below.

1.F.

1.F.1.  Project Gutenberg volunteers and employees expend considerable
effort to identify, do copyright research on, transcribe and proofread
public domain works in creating the Project Gutenberg-tm
collection.  Despite these efforts, Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works, and the medium on which they may be stored, may contain
"Defects," such as, but not limited to, incomplete, inaccurate or
corrupt data, transcription errors, a copyright or other intellectual
property infringement, a defective or damaged disk or other medium, a
computer virus, or computer codes that damage or cannot be read by
your equipment.

1.F.2.  LIMITED WARRANTY, DISCLAIMER OF DAMAGES - Except for the "Right
of Replacement or Refund" described in paragraph 1.F.3, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation, the owner of the Project
Gutenberg-tm trademark, and any other party distributing a Project
Gutenberg-tm electronic work under this agreement, disclaim all
liability to you for damages, costs and expenses, including legal
fees.  YOU AGREE THAT YOU HAVE NO REMEDIES FOR NEGLIGENCE, STRICT
LIABILITY, BREACH OF WARRANTY OR BREACH OF CONTRACT EXCEPT THOSE
PROVIDED IN PARAGRAPH 1.F.3.  YOU AGREE THAT THE FOUNDATION, THE
TRADEMARK OWNER, AND ANY DISTRIBUTOR UNDER THIS AGREEMENT WILL NOT BE
LIABLE TO YOU FOR ACTUAL, DIRECT, INDIRECT, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE OR
INCIDENTAL DAMAGES EVEN IF YOU GIVE NOTICE OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH
DAMAGE.

1.F.3.  LIMITED RIGHT OF REPLACEMENT OR REFUND - If you discover a
defect in this electronic work within 90 days of receiving it, you can
receive a refund of the money (if any) you paid for it by sending a
written explanation to the person you received the work from.  If you
received the work on a physical medium, you must return the medium with
your written explanation.  The person or entity that provided you with
the defective work may elect to provide a replacement copy in lieu of a
refund.  If you received the work electronically, the person or entity
providing it to you may choose to give you a second opportunity to
receive the work electronically in lieu of a refund.  If the second copy
is also defective, you may demand a refund in writing without further
opportunities to fix the problem.

1.F.4.  Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth
in paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you 'AS-IS' WITH NO OTHER
WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.

1.F.5.  Some states do not allow disclaimers of certain implied
warranties or the exclusion or limitation of certain types of damages.
If any disclaimer or limitation set forth in this agreement violates the
law of the state applicable to this agreement, the agreement shall be
interpreted to make the maximum disclaimer or limitation permitted by
the applicable state law.  The invalidity or unenforceability of any
provision of this agreement shall not void the remaining provisions.

1.F.6.  INDEMNITY - You agree to indemnify and hold the Foundation, the
trademark owner, any agent or employee of the Foundation, anyone
providing copies of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works in accordance
with this agreement, and any volunteers associated with the production,
promotion and distribution of Project Gutenberg-tm electronic works,
harmless from all liability, costs and expenses, including legal fees,
that arise directly or indirectly from any of the following which you do
or cause to occur: (a) distribution of this or any Project Gutenberg-tm
work, (b) alteration, modification, or additions or deletions to any
Project Gutenberg-tm work, and (c) any Defect you cause.


Section  2.  Information about the Mission of Project Gutenberg-tm

Project Gutenberg-tm is synonymous with the free distribution of
electronic works in formats readable by the widest variety of computers
including obsolete, old, middle-aged and new computers.  It exists
because of the efforts of hundreds of volunteers and donations from
people in all walks of life.

Volunteers and financial support to provide volunteers with the
assistance they need, are critical to reaching Project Gutenberg-tm's
goals and ensuring that the Project Gutenberg-tm collection will
remain freely available for generations to come.  In 2001, the Project
Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation was created to provide a secure
and permanent future for Project Gutenberg-tm and future generations.
To learn more about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation
and how your efforts and donations can help, see Sections 3 and 4
and the Foundation web page at http://www.pglaf.org.


Section 3.  Information about the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation

The Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation is a non profit
501(c)(3) educational corporation organized under the laws of the
state of Mississippi and granted tax exempt status by the Internal
Revenue Service.  The Foundation's EIN or federal tax identification
number is 64-6221541.  Its 501(c)(3) letter is posted at
http://pglaf.org/fundraising.  Contributions to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation are tax deductible to the full extent
permitted by U.S. federal laws and your state's laws.

The Foundation's principal office is located at 4557 Melan Dr. S.
Fairbanks, AK, 99712., but its volunteers and employees are scattered
throughout numerous locations.  Its business office is located at
809 North 1500 West, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, (801) 596-1887, email
business@pglaf.org.  Email contact links and up to date contact
information can be found at the Foundation's web site and official
page at http://pglaf.org

For additional contact information:
     Dr. Gregory B. Newby
     Chief Executive and Director
     gbnewby@pglaf.org


Section 4.  Information about Donations to the Project Gutenberg
Literary Archive Foundation

Project Gutenberg-tm depends upon and cannot survive without wide
spread public support and donations to carry out its mission of
increasing the number of public domain and licensed works that can be
freely distributed in machine readable form accessible by the widest
array of equipment including outdated equipment.  Many small donations
($1 to $5,000) are particularly important to maintaining tax exempt
status with the IRS.

The Foundation is committed to complying with the laws regulating
charities and charitable donations in all 50 states of the United
States.  Compliance requirements are not uniform and it takes a
considerable effort, much paperwork and many fees to meet and keep up
with these requirements.  We do not solicit donations in locations
where we have not received written confirmation of compliance.  To
SEND DONATIONS or determine the status of compliance for any
particular state visit http://pglaf.org

While we cannot and do not solicit contributions from states where we
have not met the solicitation requirements, we know of no prohibition
against accepting unsolicited donations from donors in such states who
approach us with offers to donate.

International donations are gratefully accepted, but we cannot make
any statements concerning tax treatment of donations received from
outside the United States.  U.S. laws alone swamp our small staff.

Please check the Project Gutenberg Web pages for current donation
methods and addresses.  Donations are accepted in a number of other
ways including checks, online payments and credit card donations.
To donate, please visit: http://pglaf.org/donate


Section 5.  General Information About Project Gutenberg-tm electronic
works.

Professor Michael S. Hart is the originator of the Project Gutenberg-tm
concept of a library of electronic works that could be freely shared
with anyone.  For thirty years, he produced and distributed Project
Gutenberg-tm eBooks with only a loose network of volunteer support.


Project Gutenberg-tm eBooks are often created from several printed
editions, all of which are confirmed as Public Domain in the U.S.
unless a copyright notice is included.  Thus, we do not necessarily
keep eBooks in compliance with any particular paper edition.


Most people start at our Web site which has the main PG search facility:

     http://www.gutenberg.org

This Web site includes information about Project Gutenberg-tm,
including how to make donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary
Archive Foundation, how to help produce our new eBooks, and how to
subscribe to our email newsletter to hear about new eBooks.